Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Date: 2010-12-16 04:53:02
Message-ID: 12893.1292475182@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 12/15/2010 08:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We can't change the meaning of HAVE_INT_OPTRESET because that would
>> break the declaration logic in getopt.c. I'm thinking we have to
>> complicate the #if logic in postmaster.c and postgres.c.

> I agree.

>> Will look
>> into it as soon as I get done with the contrib/seg patch (ie in an
>> hour or so).

> OK. I'll test any patch you post ASAP.

OK, patch committed so we can get testing from the existing buildfarm
members, but please try on your new installation too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2010-12-16 05:58:36 Question regarding psql or libpq
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-16 02:20:25 Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0