| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Date: | 2010-05-11 00:26:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4BE8A44E.1020209@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 5/10/10 2:21 PM, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:35:32PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> deleted,
>> or on a reporting read-only clone of your database which gets
>> recreated very
>> night and is not used for failover. High quality hardware alone
>
> s/very/every/
> or
> s/very night/periodically/
"frequently" I think. Periodically could mean once a year.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-05-11 01:04:29 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-11 00:23:10 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-11 00:50:53 | Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-11 00:23:10 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |