Re: no universally correct setting for fsync

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Date: 2010-05-11 00:23:10
Message-ID: 4BE8A36E.2050301@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers


> The real question is how much of a speed-up fsync provides compared to
> the same workload with synchronous_commit disabled. The only case for
> fsync=off is one where that number is much faster.

I can't say I've tested this. Most of my head-to-heads on fsync were
before asych existed.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-11 00:26:54 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-05-10 23:03:34 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-11 00:26:54 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Previous Message bricklen 2010-05-11 00:04:53 Re: Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command