Re: no universally correct setting for fsync

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Date: 2010-05-10 21:21:35
Message-ID: 20100510212135.GG13534@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:35:32PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> deleted,
> or on a reporting read-only clone of your database which gets
> recreated very
> night and is not used for failover. High quality hardware alone

s/very/every/
or
s/very night/periodically/

Ross
--
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu
Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist phone: 713-348-6166
The Connexions Project http://cnx.org fax: 713-348-3665
Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005
GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-05-10 23:03:34 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-10 21:20:18 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-05-10 22:43:24 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-10 21:20:18 Re: no universally correct setting for fsync