Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-18 14:15:05
Message-ID: 4B7D4B69.3020900@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.
>
>
>
>
> (BTW, by "now" I don't mean *today* --- seems better to wait till
> alpha4 has been wrapped. But as soon as that's done.)
>
>

I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate
an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and
then get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more
traditional time.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-18 14:21:25 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-18 14:12:58 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?