Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-18 14:12:58
Message-ID: 20100218141258.GB6317@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Doesn't that require that all pgindent runs produce the same output?
> Which they generally don't due to different sets of typedefs and
> stuff? It's a solvable problem of course, but not quite as simple as
> you make it sound :-)

The typedef file emitted by the buildfarm is supposed to be rather
static, no?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-02-18 14:15:05 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-18 14:09:45 Re: remove contrib/xml2