Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> > pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> > bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have
> > a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> > merge hassle at the end of beta.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (BTW, by "now" I don't mean *today* --- seems better to wait till
> > alpha4 has been wrapped. But as soon as that's done.)
> >
> >
>
> I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate
> an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and
> then get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more
> traditional time.

I am ready to run pgindent whenever requested.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +