| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table? |
| Date: | 2009-04-09 11:30:41 |
| Message-ID: | 49DDDC61.1000004@archonet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:39:02 +0100
> Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>
>> who num mails of total
>> Tom Lane 1,935 8.0%
>> Scott Marlowe 1,077 4.5%
>> Alvaro Herrera 521 2.2%
>> Joshua Drake 468 1.9%
>> Richard Huxton 432 1.8%
>> Craig Ringer 338 1.4%
>> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 314 1.3%
>
> I just wrote privately to Tom that I'm ashamed I ask so much and
> answer so few.
> But well I'm an exception ;) I'm the top of non-contributors.
Not so fast there citizen. I'll thank you to note that I've not
contributed any code either, and for a significant number of years too :-)
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-04-09 11:54:52 | Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table? |
| Previous Message | Glyn Astill | 2009-04-09 11:27:46 | Trigger function cost |