Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?

From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
Date: 2009-04-08 17:04:58
Message-ID: 20090408190458.7fcaf3c5@dawn.webthatworks.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:39:02 +0100
Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Ian Mayo wrote:
> > One more thing: hey, did you hear? I just got some advice from
> > Tom Lane!
>
> Statistically speaking; he's the person most likely to answer you
> by quite a long way. Out of the ~24k emails going back to Oct
> 2007 I've got from pgsql-general the most common people who wrote
> them are:

> who num mails of total
> Tom Lane 1,935 8.0%
> Scott Marlowe 1,077 4.5%
> Alvaro Herrera 521 2.2%
> Joshua Drake 468 1.9%
> Richard Huxton 432 1.8%
> Craig Ringer 338 1.4%
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 314 1.3%

I just wrote privately to Tom that I'm ashamed I ask so much and
answer so few.
But well I'm an exception ;) I'm the top of non-contributors.

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2009-04-08 17:15:55 Re: Table has 22 million records, but backup doesn't see them
Previous Message Radcon Entec 2009-04-08 16:58:08 Re: Table has 22 million records, but backup doesn't see them