From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql \? help display |
Date: | 2008-05-13 16:42:07 |
Message-ID: | 4829C4DF.2000808@Sheeky.Biz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I promised to review our psql \? output to see if I could improve it,
>>> particularly the "General" section at the top. Below are the results.
>>>
>>> Are the new sections ideal, and in the best ordering? Should \copyright
>>> be kept in "General" at the top? Should \? be listed?
>> Why do we have a section named "Copy, Large Objects"? It would seem to
>> make sense to put the LO stuff on its own section.
>
> OK, new version attached. I moved \copy into "External" and relabled
> the section as just "Large Object" (singular?).
>
I would think copy would fit better with i/o - basically a
subset/variation of \i
external is more for executing external code than importing data.
Yes singular - all the others are singular. If we go plural variable and
maybe connection would fit plural as well (or maybe after the multi
connection patch)?
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-13 16:53:43 | Re: Syntax decisions for pl/pgsql RAISE extension |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-13 16:30:47 | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |