From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql \? help display |
Date: | 2008-05-13 17:01:51 |
Message-ID: | 200805131701.m4DH1po28239@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shane Ambler wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> I promised to review our psql \? output to see if I could improve it,
> >>> particularly the "General" section at the top. Below are the results.
> >>>
> >>> Are the new sections ideal, and in the best ordering? Should \copyright
> >>> be kept in "General" at the top? Should \? be listed?
> >> Why do we have a section named "Copy, Large Objects"? It would seem to
> >> make sense to put the LO stuff on its own section.
> >
> > OK, new version attached. I moved \copy into "External" and relabled
> > the section as just "Large Object" (singular?).
> >
>
> I would think copy would fit better with i/o - basically a
> subset/variation of \i
> external is more for executing external code than importing data.
OK, new version attached.
> Yes singular - all the others are singular. If we go plural variable and
> maybe connection would fit plural as well (or maybe after the multi
> connection patch)?
OK, singular.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 3.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-05-13 17:55:55 | Re: Syntax decisions for pl/pgsql RAISE extension |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-13 16:57:57 | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |