| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \? help display |
| Date: | 2008-05-13 15:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200805131532.m4DFWJ514875@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I promised to review our psql \? output to see if I could improve it,
> > particularly the "General" section at the top. Below are the results.
> >
> > Are the new sections ideal, and in the best ordering? Should \copyright
> > be kept in "General" at the top? Should \? be listed?
>
> Why do we have a section named "Copy, Large Objects"? It would seem to
> make sense to put the LO stuff on its own section.
OK, new version attached. I moved \copy into "External" and relabled
the section as just "Large Object" (singular?).
> > I also pulled up some descriptive text that caused the options to have
> > blank lines between them.
>
> It was like that to keep the alignment of descriptions. It's a
> judgement call of course, but personally I think the other way was
> better.
Yea, I looked at that and though the description on a new line was
clearer it was harder to see the options in one glance. Lack of line
breaks now makes the sections easier to identify.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-13 15:42:00 | Re: bloated heapam.h |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-13 15:22:10 | Re: psql \? help display |