From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Rossi, Maria" <maria(dot)rossi(at)jackson(dot)com>, "'pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
Date: | 2018-10-09 18:28:25 |
Message-ID: | 47175ca8aea768568fb51e1a91c94d436ef79d97.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
Rossi, Maria wrote:
> I upgraded our postgres database from V9.3 to V10.5. Used pg_dumpall then restore it to the new instance.
> After the restore, we notice that 1 table had duplicate rows, such that it was not able to create the primary key.
> I checked the old database, it does not have the dups.
> Has anyone encountered having dups rows loaded? Any idea what caused this and how to prevent?
>
> Your help would be much appreciated.
I don't believe that pg_dumpall miraculously duplicated the row.
You probably *do* have a duplicate row, and hence table corruption,
but I suspect that one of the rows is not in the index you used
to look for the row.
If you query:
SELECT * FROM tab WHERE id = 42;
the query will likely use the index on "id" and find only one of
the rows.
You should
SET enable_indexscan = off;
SET enable_indexonlyscan = off;
and then repeat the query, so that a sequential scan is used.
To fix, delete one of the rows and reindex.
You can identify a row by its tuple id:
SELECT ctid, * FROM tab WHERE id = 42;
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-09 18:32:02 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
Previous Message | Rossi, Maria | 2018-10-09 18:05:51 | RE: pg_dumpall and restore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-09 18:32:02 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
Previous Message | Rossi, Maria | 2018-10-09 18:05:51 | RE: pg_dumpall and restore |