From: | "Rossi, Maria" <maria(dot)rossi(at)jackson(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: pg_dumpall and restore |
Date: | 2018-10-09 18:05:51 |
Message-ID: | 4cb8957e977348fdb7dcae372daf70ed@DC03PXMBP003.jacksonnational.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
Yes, I did use the V10.5 pg_dumpall
Maria A Rossi
From: Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 1:58 PM
To: Rossi, Maria <maria(dot)rossi(at)jackson(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall and restore
EXTERNAL EMAIL
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:19 PM Rossi, Maria <maria(dot)rossi(at)jackson(dot)com<mailto:maria(dot)rossi(at)jackson(dot)com>> wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded our postgres database from V9.3 to V10.5. Used pg_dumpall then restore it to the new instance.
After the restore, we notice that 1 table had duplicate rows, such that it was not able to create the primary key.
I checked the old database, it does not have the dups.
Has anyone encountered having dups rows loaded? Any idea what caused this and how to prevent?
Your help would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
Maria
Did you use the pg_dumpall binary from 10.5 to create the dump?
Keith
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-10-09 18:28:25 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
Previous Message | Keith | 2018-10-09 17:58:17 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-10-09 18:28:25 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |
Previous Message | Keith | 2018-10-09 17:58:17 | Re: pg_dumpall and restore |