| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Date: | 2007-05-01 21:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | 4637B26E.2020109@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>>>>> I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I think
>>>>> that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -sec is a
>>>>> giveaway)
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?
>>
>> I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable
>> without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar
>> with it.
>>
>> //Magnus
>
> gss-noprot and gss-prot
>
> gss-noenc and gss-enc
Those I like better. I still think it's unnecessary, but I won't object
to those :-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-01 21:35:55 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-01 21:34:21 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |