| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Date: | 2007-05-01 21:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | 790.1178055261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Long Answer:
> I've been dealing with OpenSSL binary incompatibility issues for the last
> few Solaris builds and it's made me very unhappy with the
> upgrade/versioning/linking of OpenSSL, and explained a lot of issues I've
> had around using OpenSSL with PostgreSQL and Apache previously. That is,
> 0.9.8 isn't always backwards compatible to 0.9.7 or 0.9.6, making
> applications built against one version of OpenSSL not necessarily portable
> or easily upgraded, and causing a lot of installation-related pain.
> (yes, I know this describes PostgreSQL as well. People complain about it
> all the time to us, and they're right)
Indeed, but I dunno why you think things will be all magically better
in GSSAPI-land. What I foresee as more likely is that we'll just be
opening up another front in the versioning war.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-05-01 21:34:38 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Previous Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2007-05-01 21:34:07 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |