From: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
Date: | 2007-05-01 21:32:37 |
Message-ID: | F1A86483-8CC8-48A2-9705-D3EBF8FA34E9@jpl.nasa.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 1, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>>
>> On May 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>>> I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I
>>>> think
>>>> that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -
>>>> sec is a
>>>> giveaway)
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?
>
> I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable
> without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar
> with it.
>
> //Magnus
gss-noprot and gss-prot
gss-noenc and gss-enc
??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2007-05-01 21:34:07 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-05-01 21:30:51 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |