| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, depesz(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: real multi-master replication? |
| Date: | 2007-03-04 20:38:20 |
| Message-ID: | 45EB2E3C.9090506@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran wrote:
> "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> hi,
>> i read about some replication system for postgresql, but - as far as i
>> know there is none real multi-master replication system for
>> postgresql.
>> all i have seen are based on "query replication" with various "hacks"
>> for specific constructions (like now()).
>> my question is - is there any (even fully commercial) multi-master
>> replication system for postgresql that will work with all possible
>> constructs, triggers, random data and so on?
>> i mean - i dont want to bother with choosing to 'note' somehow that
>> 'this particular query' has to be replicated somehow.
>> i'm thinking about working solution that will allow multi-master connections.
>>
>> anything? anywhere?
>
> Have you looked at pgpool?
afaik pgpool is statement based and not really multimaster either ...
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moran | 2007-03-04 20:45:29 | Re: real multi-master replication? |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2007-03-04 20:30:13 | Re: real multi-master replication? |