| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: real multi-master replication? |
| Date: | 2007-03-04 20:30:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20070304153013.2b34c867.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> hi,
> i read about some replication system for postgresql, but - as far as i
> know there is none real multi-master replication system for
> postgresql.
> all i have seen are based on "query replication" with various "hacks"
> for specific constructions (like now()).
> my question is - is there any (even fully commercial) multi-master
> replication system for postgresql that will work with all possible
> constructs, triggers, random data and so on?
> i mean - i dont want to bother with choosing to 'note' somehow that
> 'this particular query' has to be replicated somehow.
> i'm thinking about working solution that will allow multi-master connections.
>
> anything? anywhere?
Have you looked at pgpool?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-03-04 20:38:20 | Re: real multi-master replication? |
| Previous Message | Postgres User | 2007-03-04 20:24:16 | How to capture and handle failed INSERT |