From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, depesz(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: real multi-master replication? |
Date: | 2007-03-04 20:45:29 |
Message-ID: | 20070304154529.46abb054.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> i read about some replication system for postgresql, but - as far as i
> >> know there is none real multi-master replication system for
> >> postgresql.
> >> all i have seen are based on "query replication" with various "hacks"
> >> for specific constructions (like now()).
> >> my question is - is there any (even fully commercial) multi-master
> >> replication system for postgresql that will work with all possible
> >> constructs, triggers, random data and so on?
> >> i mean - i dont want to bother with choosing to 'note' somehow that
> >> 'this particular query' has to be replicated somehow.
> >> i'm thinking about working solution that will allow multi-master connections.
> >>
> >> anything? anywhere?
> >
> > Have you looked at pgpool?
>
> afaik pgpool is statement based and not really multimaster either ...
Well, it's multi-master to the degree that all servers are read/write,
and therefore any server can take over.
How would you define multi-master?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-03-04 20:57:11 | Re: real multi-master replication? |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-03-04 20:38:20 | Re: real multi-master replication? |