Re: real multi-master replication?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, depesz(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: real multi-master replication?
Date: 2007-03-05 00:39:48
Message-ID: 45EB66D4.9030700@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> Well, it's multi-master to the degree that all servers are read/write,
> and therefore any server can take over.
>
> How would you define multi-master?
>
>
Per the original posts consideration, pgpool would have to be able to
deal with constants such as now() and current_date.
Can it?

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-03-05 01:46:49 Re: Cannot digest subscribe
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-05 00:38:37 Re: real multi-master replication?