Re: Database performance comparison paper.

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Marc Evans <Marc(at)SoftwareHackery(dot)Com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Date: 2007-02-15 19:33:14
Message-ID: 45D4B57A.2020609@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Shelby Cain wrote:
> Excerpt from the document:
> ===================================================
> 2. What is compared here - "Apples and Oranges"
> The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the installation of all the software is simplicity. No optimization, no tweaks, no editing of configuration files.
> ===================================================
>
> That doesn't sound like a very useful methodology for benchmarking.

Thanks for the excerpt Shelby - just saved me reading the report.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-15 19:38:19 Re: Stored Procedure examples
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2007-02-15 19:33:08 Re: Database performance comparison paper.