Re: Database performance comparison paper.

On Thursday 15 February 2007 11:29, Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> ===================================================
> 2. What is compared here - "Apples and Oranges"
> The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
> installation of all the software is simplicity. No optimization, no
> tweaks, no editing of configuration files.
> ===================================================
>
> That doesn't sound like a very useful methodology for benchmarking.
>

In particular, it means they used MyISAM with no fsync for MySQL. They
might as well have sent those inserts to /dev/null, it would have been as
useful a test.

They also didn't use transactions.

--
When we vote for taxes, we are voting to steal from our neighbors