Re: Database performance comparison paper.

From: Alexander Elgert <alexander_elgert(at)adiva(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Date: 2007-02-15 20:37:51
Message-ID: 45D4C49F.5040806@adiva.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton schrieb:
> Shelby Cain wrote:
>> Excerpt from the document:
>> ===================================================
>> 2. What is compared here - "Apples and Oranges"
>> The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
>> installation of all the software is simplicity. No optimization, no
>> tweaks, no editing of configuration files.
>> ===================================================
>>
>> That doesn't sound like a very useful methodology for benchmarking.
>
> Thanks for the excerpt Shelby - just saved me reading the report.
>
There is no much to read - just look at the images. ;)
Page 24 make the point.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Casey Duncan 2007-02-15 20:42:13 Where art thou pg_clog?
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-02-15 20:25:13 Re: backup database by cloning itself