| From: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mysql/pgsql benchmarks |
| Date: | 2006-12-06 09:15:45 |
| Message-ID: | 45768A41.2090103@gmx.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/1
>
> etc. look great. However, However I could not get the idea what kind
> of benchmark programs (i.e. DB size, schema, SQL...) were used. Am I
> missing something?
At least some information is available here:
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/9
(Still not too much description, no schema etc.)
From the article:
> ... The active part of the database encompasses only a few gigabytes,
> allowing systems with 4GB to 8GB to take the entire working set into
> memory, so that even with 2GB there is not much disk activity. ...
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2006-12-06 10:01:32 | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-12-06 08:37:14 | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |