Re: This is our slashdot coverage?

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Date: 2006-12-06 08:37:14
Message-ID: C19BC13A.14D40%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh,

On 12/5/06 7:17 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> Depends. Read it another way, it implies that the only reason we're not
> better than DB2 and Oracle in every way is the lack of windowing
> functions. Wouldn't that be nice?

And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-)

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2006-12-06 09:15:45 Re: mysql/pgsql benchmarks
Previous Message Adrian Maier 2006-12-06 07:42:17 Re: Coverage of 8.2 Release