Re: This is our slashdot coverage?

From: Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Date: 2006-12-06 10:01:32
Message-ID: 200612061101.33010.kaare@jasonic.dk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> Depends. Read it another way, it implies that the only reason we're not
> better than DB2 and Oracle in every way is the lack of windowing
> functions. Wouldn't that be nice?

Isn't it true?

;-)

--

Med venlig hilsen
Kaare Rasmussen, Jasonic

Jasonic Telefon: +45 3816 2582
Nordre Fasanvej 12
2000 Frederiksberg Email: kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cornelia Boenigk 2006-12-06 11:55:45 Re: Coverage of 8.2 Release
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2006-12-06 09:15:45 Re: mysql/pgsql benchmarks