From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jie Zhang <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bitmap index status |
Date: | 2006-09-22 22:45:28 |
Message-ID: | 45146788.50608@osdl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jie Zhang wrote:
> Hi Heikki and all,
>
> I just sent the latest bitmap index patch to the list. I am not sure if
> there is any size limit for this mailing list. If you have received my
> previous email, please let me know.
Hi Jie,
I know I said I was going to get testing on this months ago but I've
been juggling between 3 systems due to disk failures and other hardware
configuration issues. Anyways, I've take a baseline run of only the
power test using a 1GB database with the patch 09-17 patch against a
snapshot of pgsql from 2006-09-17:
http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt3testing/results/dev8-007/2/
Do you think the 1GB scale factor will be sufficient for testing as it
will certainly be faster? Do you think testing with just a power test
will be sufficient for now? I really don't have a good reason why I
didn't run a throughput test other than to save time. :) I also wanted
to get your opinion again on which indexes we will want to try first.
Thanks,
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-22 22:45:40 | Traveling to Oxford, England |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-22 21:52:55 | Re: advisory locks and permissions |