From: | "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Wong" <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bitmap index status |
Date: | 2006-09-25 18:19:35 |
Message-ID: | C13D6BC7.B381%jzhang@greenplum.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Mark,
Thanks for doing the test. I checked out the link you provided below. I am a
little confused about the goal of these tests. Do you plan to test the
overall performance of postgreSQL on handling TPC-H queries?
Thanks,
Jie
On 9/22/06 3:45 PM, "Mark Wong" <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> wrote:
> Jie Zhang wrote:
>> Hi Heikki and all,
>>
>> I just sent the latest bitmap index patch to the list. I am not sure if
>> there is any size limit for this mailing list. If you have received my
>> previous email, please let me know.
>
> Hi Jie,
>
> I know I said I was going to get testing on this months ago but I've
> been juggling between 3 systems due to disk failures and other hardware
> configuration issues. Anyways, I've take a baseline run of only the
> power test using a 1GB database with the patch 09-17 patch against a
> snapshot of pgsql from 2006-09-17:
>
> http://dbt.osdl.org/dbt/dbt3testing/results/dev8-007/2/
>
> Do you think the 1GB scale factor will be sufficient for testing as it
> will certainly be faster? Do you think testing with just a power test
> will be sufficient for now? I really don't have a good reason why I
> didn't run a throughput test other than to save time. :) I also wanted
> to get your opinion again on which indexes we will want to try first.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Wong | 2006-09-25 18:32:50 | Re: Bitmap index status |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-09-25 17:53:00 | Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2 |