Re: advisory locks and permissions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: advisory locks and permissions
Date: 2006-09-22 21:52:55
Message-ID: 28880.1158961975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I guess it is a compatibility change, but weighing compatibility against
> clarity, I am leaning toward clarity. I assume it is this line that
> would be changed:
> _("user lock [%u,%u,%u,%u]"),

You assume wrong ... that has nothing to do with what appears in pg_locks.

Sigh. I'll go break up the locktag into two.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2006-09-22 22:45:28 Re: Bitmap index status
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-09-22 21:07:54 Re: initdb ignores invalid locale names