From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
Date: | 2006-08-04 14:53:16 |
Message-ID: | 44D35F5C.8010901@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> It's a pity that some expectations have been raised about features that
>> we haven't seen patches for, MERGE/UPSERT & recursive queries
>
> Honestly, I've only had four people say it would be nice to have
> hierarchical queries (one of them wasn't even a PostgreSQL user).
You obviously aren't dealing with the number of people I am :) I get
this question all the time.
> I agree. The real problem is that we don't look at things in a
> business-like, "what are we going to have in the next release"
> perspective. Being as it's an OSS community, we just see what patches
> come in and we apply what we choose... then pick which ones we see as
> "major features" and announce them.
>
> I'd like to be mistaken here, but I don't think we've ever really had
> release planning in regards to features. We can always sit down after
> 8.2 is finalized and plan what are we doing for 8.3 and go from there.
The only way we will get even a reasonable about of release planning is
for the commercial entities involved around PostgreSQL to put a lot more
resources into actually developing PostgreSQL.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-08-04 14:53:20 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-04 14:49:38 | Re: 8.2 features status |