| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 14:53:20 |
| Message-ID: | C0F8AD70.2D410%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh,
On 8/4/06 7:47 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> 3) Index only access (new)
>
> Does this mean, I have hit the index and have the actual tuple data in
> the index row? So I don't have to go back to the relation to get the info?
Yep. Fix the visibility issue - there are a number of good ideas on how to
do it, we are in a position to bang it out now IMO.
>> We already have splitting queries among CPUs and machines.
>
> Yes, YOU do. We don't.
Details, details - redefine "We" and it's the same thing.
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-04 15:28:31 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-04 14:53:16 | Re: 8.2 features status |