Re: 8.2 features status

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 14:49:38
Message-ID: 20060804144938.GJ2478@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:37:32AM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> I agree. The real problem is that we don't look at things in a
> business-like, "what are we going to have in the next release"
> perspective. Being as it's an OSS community, we just see what patches
> come in and we apply what we choose... then pick which ones we see as
> "major features" and announce them.

There's a fairly standard way of getting people to do things for you:
pay them money. Thing is, people can run around making lists of thing
that would be cool, but no-one can really force anyone to do anything.

Now, there are the priveledged few who are being paid to work on
postgres. If you can convince their employers to fund things on the
list, it might help. Also, some stuff might work well as Google SoC
projects...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-04 14:53:16 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-04 14:49:14 Re: 8.2 features status