| From: | Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Best Procedural Language? |
| Date: | 2006-08-02 10:58:56 |
| Message-ID: | 44D08570.5070803@secdat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christopher Browne wrote:
>Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when "Carlo Stonebanks" <cstonebanks(at)nissenfasteners(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>>I am interested in finding out a "non-religious" answer to which
>>procedural language has the richest and most robust implementation
>>for Postgres. C is at the bottom of my list because of how much
>>damage runaway code can cause. I also would like a solution which is
>>platorm-independent; we develop on Windows but may deploy on Linux.
>>
>>
>
>
>
I would dearly love to see plPHP join the family as a real supported
language, right in the distribution.
Just thought I'd mention that while we're on the topic.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| ken.vcf | text/x-vcard | 186 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Dale | 2006-08-02 11:09:17 | Re: Performance/Issues with CMP and JBoss |
| Previous Message | Ilja Golshtein | 2006-08-02 10:57:59 | pgstat.c: send/EINTR issue |