Re: Best Procedural Language?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Date: 2006-08-02 14:33:11
Message-ID: 44D0B7A7.1000701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> I would dearly love to see plPHP join the family as a real supported
> language, right in the distribution.

You mean as opposed a real support language outside of the distribution?
Being in core doesn't really gain us much except a prestige moniker.

But to answer your question, there is some work that needs to be done first.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Just thought I'd mention that while we're on the topic.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sundar Narayanaswamy 2006-08-02 14:36:09 Re: Autovacuum help..
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2006-08-02 14:31:20 Re: ECPG and COPY