From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | buildfarm future |
Date: | 2006-07-13 18:43:16 |
Message-ID: | 44B69444.8050407@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
I intended to post this anyway as a followup to the conference session,
but I have been spurred to do it nowby the Pl/J(ava) discussion.
I outlined a number of possible directions for buildfarm, and we had a
good discussion.
Based on that, my current intention is to make provision for the
following, and pretty much in this order:
. an optional pgbench run at the end of each buildfarm run, plus
supporting web page to plot stats
. clean and release web code
. extra core/contrib/PL regression tests that come with the core
distribution but are not done by make {check, installcheck}
. extra core regression tests that are not in the core distribution
(maybe download from pgfoundry)
. support for non-core projects - initially for slony-1 (because they
asked me about it ages ago).
In connection with the last item, Thomas asked me at the conference to
consider a setup for PL/Java. If, as I suspect, we end up with something
similar to the status quo, I will certainly do so, but it might be a while.
If anyone with some good perl skill wants to jump in and help they will
be welcome.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-07-13 21:20:12 | Re: buildfarm future |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-06-21 11:04:44 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] VPN option? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-13 18:46:11 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-13 18:40:31 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |