From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Date: | 2006-07-13 18:40:31 |
Message-ID: | 44B6939F.9030701@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>The right way to proceed is what was mentioned in another message: work
>harder at educating packagers about which non-core projects are worth
>including in their packages. I have to confess contributing to the
>problem, as I'm not currently including eg. Slony in the Red Hat RPMs.
>I certainly should be --- but "fixing" that by pushing Slony into the
>core PG distro is not a solution.
>
>
>
Well, there are other good reasons not to in the slony case.
But anyway, I was wondering if we could make life easier by providing a
script which would fetch some set of addon features, and make building
the whole lot together easy.
No doubt some people will not want to make choices, but I think we need
to, to some extent. I broadly agree with what Martijn has just said,
although I doubt that pgFoundry's Top Downloads section is much of a
guide. If we recommend something we need to be prepared to exerciase
some jusgement and have the courage of our convictions.
Personally, I would start with:
pl/java
pl/ruby
pl/php
jdbc driver
odbc driver
npgsql
python stuff (not sure which, as I don't use it)
The perl and php clients, and libpqxx would also be possibilities.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-13 18:43:16 | buildfarm future |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-07-13 18:32:25 | Re: Updateable views for 8.2 or 8.3? |