From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Date: | 2006-06-02 15:27:13 |
Message-ID: | 448058D1.4040504@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and
>>> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty.
>>
>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?"
>> for such a directory?
>
> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn?
>
yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about.
At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many times
we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists on having a
clean repo.
I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent case
the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly keen on
that approach - but I am open to persuasion.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-02 15:57:45 | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-02 15:21:54 | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |