From: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Date: | 2006-06-03 14:42:03 |
Message-ID: | B7CB5762-6EB5-470D-BECE-5013E7736588@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 2, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory
>>>> and then later prunes it when it finds it is empty.
>>>
>>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print
>>> a "?"
>>> for such a directory?
>>
>> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn?
>>
>
> yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about.
>
> At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many
> times we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists
> on having a clean repo.
>
> I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent
> case the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly
> keen on that approach - but I am open to persuasion.
Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any
unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows
machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-03 14:56:44 | Re: COPY (query) TO file |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-06-03 14:22:19 | Re: COPY (query) TO file |