From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Date: | 2006-06-02 15:21:54 |
Message-ID: | 29346.1149261714@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and
>>> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty.
>>
>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?"
>> for such a directory?
> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn?
But cvs certainly knows "what it is" if it's a subdirectory subject to
creation and pruning; that means the subdirectory exists in the
repository.
I doubt that cvs would complain about a pre-existing subdirectory of
this type either, because that would result in an unreasonable amount of
chatter when adding or removing the -P option.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-02 15:27:13 | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-06-02 15:19:50 | Re: Going for 'all green' buildfarm results |