| From: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary |
| Date: | 2006-03-22 22:00:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4421C8E0.2090305@amsoftwaredesign.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dave Page wrote:
> Well in fairness to Tony we do refer to it as a 'contrib' module, but
> that's because it uses the contrib build system (or PGXS in SVN trunk).
>
>
> Devrim has said he will
> build it as a separate RPM - in the meantime a source tarball can be
> downloaded from http://www.pgadmin.org/download/adminpacks.php, or the
> PGXS compatible versions can be found in SVN under
> http://svn.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/pgadmin3/xtra/
>
>
>
Hi Dave,
a seperate rpm would be fine as long as it is just the admin module stuff.
I wasn't clear on Devrim's first response, it sounded like he was going
to make a seperate pgAdmin rpm that included
the admin module.
Later,
Tony
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-22 22:02:03 | Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary |
| Previous Message | Brian Kitzberger | 2006-03-22 21:59:50 | Hi, |