Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
Date: 2006-03-22 22:02:03
Message-ID: 20196.1143064923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Yeah - wxWidgets, GTK etc. but none are required by the admin module,
> only by pgAdmin itself on the users workstation.

Oh, so what we're talking about is some server-side support functions
for the pgAdmin client? OK, that's not what I was envisioning. From
a dependency standpoint it might be OK to package that as a contrib
module. I would say the main point for or against is whether you are
ready to tie the releases of the support functions to releases of the
core server. If they should naturally go with pgAdmin releases then
it'd be sticky to have them in contrib.

There's also a licensing issue which is that pgAdmin is GPL, while
we're trying to make sure that all contrib modules are licensed
the same as the core server.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-03-22 22:12:03 Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
Previous Message Tony Caduto 2006-03-22 22:00:00 Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary