Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>My idea is that the second stage would just have them go to src/pl/plphp
>>and type 'gmake install'.
>
>
> Absolutely not. It has to work as an independent package, not as
> something that expects to build inside an already-configured Postgres
> source tree. That means its own configure etc.

Wait I am confused. Right now plPHP is setup to be a part of the source
tree. It uses ./configure --with-php etc...

So where are we going?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Basically, we can keep the files in our CVS for ease of maintenance,
> but that is not going to show up at all in terms of what is shipped
> in the two tarballs --- they will be independent products.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org