| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-05 02:25:37 |
| Message-ID: | 16772.1115259937@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> My idea is that the second stage would just have them go to src/pl/plphp
> and type 'gmake install'.
Absolutely not. It has to work as an independent package, not as
something that expects to build inside an already-configured Postgres
source tree. That means its own configure etc.
Basically, we can keep the files in our CVS for ease of maintenance,
but that is not going to show up at all in terms of what is shipped
in the two tarballs --- they will be independent products.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-05 02:56:14 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-05 01:54:41 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-05 02:56:14 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-05 01:54:41 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |