Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-05 03:13:38
Message-ID: 20050505001154.P42300@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>
>>> My idea is that the second stage would just have them go to src/pl/plphp
>>> and type 'gmake install'.
>>
>>
>> Absolutely not. It has to work as an independent package, not as
>> something that expects to build inside an already-configured Postgres
>> source tree. That means its own configure etc.
>
> Wait I am confused. Right now plPHP is setup to be a part of the source tree.
> It uses ./configure --with-php etc...
>
> So where are we going?

plphp.tar.gz being seperately buildable from the core distribution,
without the core distribution source files ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 03:30:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-05 02:56:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 03:24:49 Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-05-05 03:09:36 Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze