Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 21:10:37
Message-ID: 4276974D.1070400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for
>>buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but
>>would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's
>>creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.
>>
>>
>
>Would you be open to someone else adding the capability? And maybe
>mention that on the buildfarm site? (And before anyone asks, no, this
>doesn't interest me enough for me to do it :P)
>
>

Of course. I won't hold my breath waiting, though :-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Held 2005-05-02 21:32:37 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 21:02:37 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Held 2005-05-02 21:32:37 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 21:05:56 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1