From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-02 21:10:37 |
Message-ID: | 4276974D.1070400@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for
>>buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but
>>would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's
>>creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.
>>
>>
>
>Would you be open to someone else adding the capability? And maybe
>mention that on the buildfarm site? (And before anyone asks, no, this
>doesn't interest me enough for me to do it :P)
>
>
Of course. I won't hold my breath waiting, though :-)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Held | 2005-05-02 21:32:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-02 21:02:37 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Held | 2005-05-02 21:32:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-02 21:05:56 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |