From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr |
Cc: | andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-02 21:05:56 |
Message-ID: | 20050502210556.GZ47820@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FWIW, I've found myself wishing I could set statement_timeout on a per user
or per group basis. Likewise for log_min_duration_statement.
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:38:12PM +0300, adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2005 19:53:56 -0000
> Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >The server-based method is actually no more complex to
> >implement on the server end and does not impose any such
> restrictions on
> >the client (even if the client sets the option and then
> ignores the database connection
> >for a long time, all that happens is that the TCP window
> fills up).
>
> Yes, any solution on the client side also requires all
> client connection interface to be changed..But, at server
> side solution only server side would be changed :-) I dont
> know it is complex or not. as you know Oracle has a
> parameter to implement that solution on the server side.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Adnan DURSUN
> ASRIN Bili?im Hiz.Ltd.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-02 21:10:37 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-02 21:02:37 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |