Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 21:02:37
Message-ID: 20050502210237.GY47820@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for
> buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but
> would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's
> creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.

Would you be open to someone else adding the capability? And maybe
mention that on the buildfarm site? (And before anyone asks, no, this
doesn't interest me enough for me to do it :P)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-02 21:10:37 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Rosser Schwarz 2005-05-02 21:01:07 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 21:05:56 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Rosser Schwarz 2005-05-02 21:01:07 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company