| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | matt(at)followers(dot)net |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performance hit for replication |
| Date: | 2005-04-12 17:13:27 |
| Message-ID: | 425C01B7.30603@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>>>I'm eager to hear your thoughts and experiences,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well with replicator you are going to take a pretty big hit initially
>>during the full
>>sync but then you could use batch replication and only replicate every
>>2-3 hours.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>>
>
>Thanks, I'm looking at your product and will contact you off list for more
>details soon.
>
>Out of curiosity, does batch mode produce a lighter load?
>
Well more of a burstier load. You could also do live replication but
replicator requires
some IO which VMWare just ins't that good at :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Worthington | 2005-04-12 18:14:26 | Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases |
| Previous Message | Matthew Nuzum | 2005-04-12 16:55:40 | Re: performance hit for replication |