Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases

From: "Keith Worthington" <keithw(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com>
To: "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arrayservicesgrp(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Perform" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases
Date: 2005-04-12 18:14:26
Message-ID: 20050412181234.M15392@narrowpathinc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:41:55 -0500, Dave Held wrote
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keith Worthington [mailto:KeithW(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:44 PM
> > To: Neil Conway
> > Cc: PostgreSQL Perform
> > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 4 way JOIN using aliases
> >
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > Keith Worthington wrote:
> > >
> > >> -> Seq Scan on tbl_current
> > (cost=0.00..1775.57 rows=76457
> > >> width=31) (actual time=22.870..25.024 rows=605 loops=1)
> > >
> > >
> > > This rowcount is way off -- have you run ANALYZE recently?
> > > [...]
> >
> > I run vacuumdb with the analyze option every morning via a
> > cron job. In my ignorance I do not know if that is the same
> > thing.
>
> Pass it an --analyze option if you aren't already.
>
> __
> David B. Held
>

Here is the command I have in the cron file.

vacuumdb --full --analyze --verbose --username dbuser --dbname ${IPA_DB} >>
${IPA_LOG_DIR}/ipavcmdb.log 2>&1

If this performs the analyze as I thought it should I do not know why the row
count is so badly off.

Kind Regards,
Keith

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Held 2005-04-12 18:22:12 Re: 4 way JOIN using aliases
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-12 17:13:27 Re: performance hit for replication